Both the opposition and the pro RH bill claims that they both are pro- life and claims that the other is the one that promotes otherwise. Anti - RH Bill people claims that the RH Bill promotes abortion and promiscuity, inspite the clear evidence that RH bill does not really support abortion. They also say that contraceptives also "kills future lives." On the other side RH bill supporters claims that it would save the life of the mother and the child. The mother in a sense that she could have more or less determine how many children their family could have which also means that it would lessen the dangers of giving birth and for the child as there are times that some families do not really have the capability to nurture a child.


So this question comes next; which side is the genuine "pro - life" advocates?